Please watch the video below. Please post any question/comments that you might have in relation to this video alone directly below. To post a question or comment just click on the comment link directly below this video.
I really liked how the miscues were isolated to only identifying the three cueing systems. It seemed more manageable to code and understand the coding. You used some self questioning language while you were analyzing the miscues for each system. Could you put those self questions out so I could print them out and use as I code my miscues? Also, I know we will get into the deeper coding of the miscues in the other videos, but I feel as though there is a lot of subjectiveness to those layers, such as was it high, medium, or low graphophonics. Another subjective piece I found in this video was the miscue of the tiger/lion. Once you stated that there were probably pictures available it made more sense to me as to how you coded it, but I think I would have coded it as not having semantics
I am also with Kim on the lion/tiger part. I kind of looked at it and coded it myself before watching the rest of the video and I coded it the same way. I also think that meaning is not made if the animals are not the same. It is had said something like kitten/cat then yes but these are two different animals and if we asked what kind of animal is this page about the child would not get it correct. So a little further discussion as to why this is correct would be helpful to me.
This is a good example to show how miscue is not an exact science. I love Theresa how you said that if the student as said kitten/cat you would have given them credit because as far as I looked at the miscue this child made I determined that 1) tiger and lion are both in the cat family in the larger animal kingdom world and 2) when you look at the entire story the point of the story is that all these different animals have whiskers. Asking the child to go back and get each animal correctly is the same as asking what color Harry Potters socks were when he met a certain creature. It is a small detail in the whole concept of the story.
I found that I was agreeing with everything you said. In fact I was thinking I did a good job with the analysis if the miscues we had to download. Of course it would have been easier if I had watched this first.
I really liked how the miscues were isolated to only identifying the three cueing systems. It seemed more manageable to code and understand the coding.
ReplyDeleteYou used some self questioning language while you were analyzing the miscues for each system. Could you put those self questions out so I could print them out and use as I code my miscues?
Also, I know we will get into the deeper coding of the miscues in the other videos, but I feel as though there is a lot of subjectiveness to those layers, such as was it high, medium, or low graphophonics.
Another subjective piece I found in this video was the miscue of the tiger/lion. Once you stated that there were probably pictures available it made more sense to me as to how you coded it, but I think I would have coded it as not having semantics
I am also with Kim on the lion/tiger part. I kind of looked at it and coded it myself before watching the rest of the video and I coded it the same way. I also think that meaning is not made if the animals are not the same. It is had said something like kitten/cat then yes but these are two different animals and if we asked what kind of animal is this page about the child would not get it correct. So a little further discussion as to why this is correct would be helpful to me.
ReplyDeleteooh, I guess I should tell you that I am fidgety frog. Theresa Daenport
ReplyDeleteThis is a good example to show how miscue is not an exact science. I love Theresa how you said that if the student as said kitten/cat you would have given them credit because as far as I looked at the miscue this child made I determined that 1) tiger and lion are both in the cat family in the larger animal kingdom world and 2) when you look at the entire story the point of the story is that all these different animals have whiskers. Asking the child to go back and get each animal correctly is the same as asking what color Harry Potters socks were when he met a certain creature. It is a small detail in the whole concept of the story.
ReplyDeleteI found that I was agreeing with everything you said. In fact I was thinking I did a good job with the analysis if the miscues we had to download. Of course it would have been easier if I had watched this first.
ReplyDelete